Reproducible · Auditable · Verifiable

Research should survive contact with the reader.

RAVA is an interactive publication format where the manuscript, evidence, and evaluation logic are released as one inspectable object. A claim you can test—not only read.

MANUSCRIPT+DATA+EVALUATION=ONE RESEARCH OBJECT

A paper is a record. RAVA makes it inspectable.

The format does not replace peer review or rewrite the paper. It creates a faithful interface around the evidence so a reader can encounter the research as a sequence of testable decisions.

Reproducible

The experiment is not described at a distance. Its inputs, transformations, and results remain available for the reader to rerun.

Auditable

Every interaction resolves back to a source claim, figure, definition, or method. The manuscript stays authoritative.

Verifiable

Readers form a hypothesis before seeing the result, then test whether the evidence supports the published conclusion.

From manuscript to investigation.

A compact editorial method for turning static evidence into a reader-led sequence without loosening its connection to the paper.

  1. 01

    Start with the doubt

    Open on the result that deserves scrutiny, not a generic abstract.

  2. 02

    Expose the evidence

    Let the reader alter the assumptions, features, and evaluation frame.

  3. 03

    Return to the record

    Pair every discovery with the manuscript passage that supports it.

Nothing invented. Nothing detached.

01Every number comes from the source manuscript or its released evidence.

02Every interaction declares what changed and what stayed fixed.

03Every conclusion returns the reader to the authoritative record.

Built inside the research, not around it.

RAVA was created by Kian Esmaeili as a publication interface for research that benefits from direct inspection. The first article uses his own machine-learning evaluation work, so the format is tested against a real manuscript, real evidence, and the need for methodological restraint.